Home/New York Court of Appeals/Bruni v. Collis

Bruni v. Collis

216 N.E.2d 710, 17 N.Y.2d 707, 269 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1476
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1966·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Burke and Keating. Judges Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint as to defendant MacCallum upon the ground that there was no evidence of scienter of any propensity in this horse calling upon defendant MacCallum to take more than ordinary care in the confinement of horses (Benoit v. Troy & Lansingburgh R. R. Co., 154 N. Y. 223; Van Leuven v. Lyke, 1 N.Y. 515; Brown v. Willard, 278 App. Div. 728, affd. 303 N. Y. 727).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruni v. Collis, 216 N.E.2d 710, 17 N.Y.2d 707, 269 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1476 (N.Y. 1966).

216 N.E.2d 710 (Bruni v. Collis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Leuven v. Lyke & Dumond
1 N.Y. 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1848)
Benoit v. . Troy Lansingburgh R.R. Co.
48 N.E. 524 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
Brown v. Willard
278 A.D. 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Brown v. Willard
103 N.E.2d 343 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)