Bruni v. Collis
This text of 216 N.E.2d 710 (Bruni v. Collis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Burke and Keating. Judges Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint as to defendant MacCallum upon the ground that there was no evidence of scienter of any propensity in this horse calling upon defendant MacCallum to take more than ordinary care in the confinement of horses (Benoit v. Troy & Lansingburgh R. R. Co., 154 N. Y. 223; Van Leuven v. Lyke, 1 N.Y. 515; Brown v. Willard, 278 App. Div. 728, affd. 303 N. Y. 727).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 N.E.2d 710, 17 N.Y.2d 707, 269 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruni-v-collis-ny-1966.