Bruner v. United States

189 F.2d 255, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3164
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 1, 1951·No. 13411_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brought under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(d) (2), to recover moneys claimed to be due plaintiff for services rendered under contract with the United States and not paid for, plaintiff’s suit was met by a motion to dismiss on the ground that, under the controlling decision in this circuit, Kennedy v. United States, 146 F.2d 26, plaintiff was an officer of the United States, and the court was without jurisdiction.

The district judge, on evidence sufficient to support his conclusion, found: that the plaintiff was appointed by the Secretary of War, pursuant to Art. II, Sec. 2, Clause 2, of the Constitution; that he was an officer of the United States; and that the court was without jurisdiction of his claim. So determining, he dismissed the suit on that ground, and this appeal followed.

We agree that the case is ruled by Kennedy v. United States, supra, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruner v. United States, 189 F.2d 255, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3164 (5th Cir. 1951).

189 F.2d 255 (Bruner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walsh v. United States
156 F. Supp. 619 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1957)
United States v. Beal
199 F.2d 498 (Sixth Circuit, 1952)