Bruner v. Stout

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Bruner v. Stout

3 Ky. 225

DecidedApril 18, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ky. 225 (Bruner v. Stout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruner v. Stout, 3 Ky. 225 (Ky. Ct. App. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court. — This was. an action of assumpsit, brought on a parol agreement, which does not appear from the declaration to have been reduced to writing. A writ of inquiry was executed, and judgment rendered for the damages assessed by the jury.

This court is of opinion the judgment is erroneous ; because there is nO consideration laid in the declaration, [226]*226sufficient to support the action,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court. — This was. an action of assumpsit, brought on a parol agreement, which does not appear from the declaration to have been reduced to writing. A writ of inquiry was executed, and judgment rendered for the damages assessed by the jury.

This court is of opinion the judgment is erroneous ; because there is nO consideration laid in the declaration, [226]*226sufficient to support the action,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Ky. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruner-v-stout-kyctapp-1808.