Bruner v. State

398 So. 2d 1005
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 21, 1981
DocketAB-277
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 398 So. 2d 1005 (Bruner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruner v. State, 398 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

398 So.2d 1005 (1981)

DeWayne Lee BRUNER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. AB-277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 21, 1981.

DeWayne Lee Bruner, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Bruner appeals the denial of his motion to correct sentence contending he is entitled to additional jail time credit pursuant to the principles enunciated in Voulo v. Wainwright, 290 So.2d 58 (Fla. 1974) and Gordon v. State, 379 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). These cases indicate that a defendant is entitled to jail time credit for the period of time he was held on the charge which prompted the revocation of his probation. However, it is well settled that a defendant, being held on numerous charges, is not entitled to a multiple credit. Miller v. State, 297 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Watson v. State, 340 So.2d 961 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied 348 So.2d 955 (Fla. 1977); Radley v. State, 372 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We are unable to determine from the record whether Bruner received the jail time credit against the St. John's County sentence. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court to determine if credit was applied to Bruner's St. John's County sentence. If not, such credit shall be applied to the present sentence, and the trial court may enter an order amending the sentence. Bruner need not be present for this purpose.

*1006 The order appealed is affirmed, but the cause is remanded with directions.

SHAW and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weaver v. State
796 So. 2d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Parker v. State
706 So. 2d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Bank v. State
632 So. 2d 640 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
In Re Joyner
769 P.2d 967 (California Supreme Court, 1989)
Lavallee v. State
462 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Thompson v. Wainwright
447 So. 2d 383 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Young v. State
427 So. 2d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Scott v. State
439 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Brooks v. State
421 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 So. 2d 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruner-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.