Bruner v. Kansas Moline Plow Co.
This text of 1909 OK 155 (Bruner v. Kansas Moline Plow Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs -in error move this court to retax the costs in the above-entitled cause, on the ground that the fees -or costs taxed in the trial court and in the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory are in excess of those allowed by law.
*159 The 'only way that this court may re-examine the taxing of costs in the 'trial court is on appeal, by means of a bill of exceptions or case-made; and this being an original motion filed in this court, as to the costs taxed in the trial court, the same, as to such costs, is denied for want of jurisdiction of this court.
It further appears from the records of this court that $64 is taxed for printing the record. Under the rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, records were required to be printed, and were taxed as a part of the costs of the case.
Movants failing to specifically point out wherein the cost for the printing of the record is excessive, the motion as to such 'item is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1909 OK 155, 103 P. 673, 24 Okla. 158, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruner-v-kansas-moline-plow-co-okla-1909.