Bruner v. Bruner

575 P.2d 928, 94 Nev. 122, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 499
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1978·No. No. 9140·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

We are asked to annul a discretionary order denying a father’s motion to change the custody of his son. There was substantial evidence submitted to support the apparent conclusion of the court that the child’s welfare would not be enhanced by a change of custody.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruner v. Bruner, 575 P.2d 928, 94 Nev. 122, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 499 (Neb. 1978).

575 P.2d 928 (Bruner v. Bruner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.