Bruner v. Bailey
363 So. 2d 166, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16456
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1978·No. No. 77-230·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, we determine the only error having been made to appear was in the trial court’s entering summary final judgment on count two (negligence) of the complaint, as genuine issues of material facts exist. Accordingly, summary final judgment as to count two is reversed. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bruner v. Bailey, 363 So. 2d 166, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16456 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
363 So. 2d 166 (Bruner v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kovarnik v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.
363 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)