Bruner v. Bailey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bruner v. Bailey

363 So. 2d 166, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16456

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 11, 1978

DocketNo. 77-230

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 363 So. 2d 166 (Bruner v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruner v. Bailey, 363 So. 2d 166, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16456 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, we determine the only error having been made to appear was in the trial court’s entering summary final judgment on count two (negligence) of the complaint, as genuine issues of material facts exist. Accordingly, summary final judgment as to count two is reversed. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CROSS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, we determine the only error having been made to appear was in the trial court’s entering summary final judgment on count two (negligence) of the complaint, as genuine issues of material facts exist. Accordingly, summary final judgment as to count two is reversed. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CROSS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., dissents with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 So. 2d 166, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruner-v-bailey-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack