Brunelle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

D.C. Circuit

Brunelle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

192 F.2d 423, 89 U.S. App. D.C. 410

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 18, 1951

Docket10983

StatusPublished

This text of 192 F.2d 423 (Brunelle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brunelle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 192 F.2d 423, 89 U.S. App. D.C. 410 (D.C. Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

192 F.2d 423

BRUNELLE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 10983.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

October 18, 1951.

On Petition for Review of Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Scott P. Crampton, Washington, D. C., with whom Darius F. Prince and Dwight D. Taylor, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for petitioner.

Carlton Fox, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., with whom Ellis N. Slack and Robert N. Anderson, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., were on the brief, for respondent.

Rollin H. Transue and Lee A. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., and Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for respondent.

Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Tax Court of the United States is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Murdock. 15 T.C. 766.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI