Bruneau v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bruneau v. Herman

13 A.D.2d 1029, 217 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10003

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 1029 (Bruneau v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruneau v. Herman, 13 A.D.2d 1029, 217 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, by a landlord to review and annul a determination of the State Rent Administrator, the landlord appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 12, 1961, denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding. The State Rent Administrator determined that a two-family house was being used as a three-family house and, therefore, was not subject to decontrol. Such determination overruled the Local Rent Administrator’s finding that under the circumstances herein the renting of the attic room in this house was not a renting to a separate family within the meaning of subdivision 12 of section 9 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulation adopted by the Temporary State Housing Rent Commission pursuant to the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (L. 1950, eh. 250, as amd. by L. 1959, eh. 695). Order affirmed, without costs. There was substantial evidence to support the finding [1030]*1030of the State Rent Administrator. Accordingly, the finding may not be disturbed. (Matter of Bosco v. Weaver, 5 A D 2d 879.) Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, by a landlord to review and annul a determination of the State Rent Administrator, the landlord appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 12, 1961, denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding. The State Rent Administrator determined that a two-family house was being used as a three-family house and, therefore, was not subject to decontrol. Such determination overruled the Local Rent Administrator’s finding that under the circumstances herein the renting of the attic room in this house was not a renting to a separate family within the meaning of subdivision 12 of section 9 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulation adopted by the Temporary State Housing Rent Commission pursuant to the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (L. 1950, eh. 250, as amd. by L. 1959, eh. 695). Order affirmed, without costs. There was substantial evidence to support the finding [1030]*1030of the State Rent Administrator. Accordingly, the finding may not be disturbed. (Matter of Bosco v. Weaver, 5 A D 2d 879.) Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 1029, 217 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruneau-v-herman-nyappdiv-1961.