Brune v. Kings Creek of Gainesville, Inc.
317 So. 2d 848
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 1975·No. No. W-223·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
We have considered the record and briefs filed in this cause. Although there were conflicts in the evidence, such conflicts were resolved by the trial judge who was the trier of both the facts and the law. Where evidence is conflicting, we are not privileged to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court even were we inclined to so do, unless' clearly unsupported by the evidence. Walker v. Connolly, Fla.App. (1st), 299 So.2d 67. The evidence supports the findings of the trial judge and we find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brune v. Kings Creek of Gainesville, Inc., 317 So. 2d 848 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
317 So. 2d 848 (Brune v. Kings Creek of Gainesville, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moring v. Levy
452 So. 2d 1069 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Flagship National Bank v. Gray Distribution Systems, Inc.
445 So. 2d 1080 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
City of Jacksonville v. Acker
385 So. 2d 706 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Demaggio v. Demaggio
317 So. 2d 848 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)