Brune v. Kings Creek of Gainesville, Inc.
This text of 317 So. 2d 848 (Brune v. Kings Creek of Gainesville, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have considered the record and briefs filed in this cause. Although there were conflicts in the evidence, such conflicts were resolved by the trial judge who was the trier of both the facts and the law. Where evidence is conflicting, we are not privileged to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court even were we inclined to so do, unless' clearly unsupported by the evidence. Walker v. Connolly, Fla.App. (1st), 299 So.2d 67. The evidence supports the findings of the trial judge and we find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
317 So. 2d 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brune-v-kings-creek-of-gainesville-inc-fladistctapp-1975.