Brundige v. Jensen

Fourth Circuit

Brundige v. Jensen

204 F. App'x 178

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 2, 2006·No. No. 06-1599·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keith Brundige appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brundige v. Jensen, No. 1:06-cv-00111-TSE (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[179]*179fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Keith Brundige appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brundige v. Jensen, No. 1:06-cv-00111-TSE (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[179]*179fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brundige v. Jensen, 204 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

204 F. App'x 178 (Brundige v. Jensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.