Brundige v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brundige v. Bradley

268 A.D. 952, 51 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4379

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 952 (Brundige v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brundige v. Bradley, 268 A.D. 952, 51 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the judgment is contrary to law and contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to revoke a'trust.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and Larkin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the judgment is contrary to law and contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to revoke a'trust.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and Larkin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D. 952, 51 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brundige-v-bradley-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack