Brundige v. Bradley
268 A.D. 952, 51 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4379
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the judgment is contrary to law and contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to revoke a'trust.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and Larkin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brundige v. Bradley, 268 A.D. 952, 51 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
268 A.D. 952 (Brundige v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Runals
68 Misc. 2d 967 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1972)