Brundige v. Bassett

Fourth Circuit

Brundige v. Bassett

219 F. App'x 308

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2007·No. No. 06-1749·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keith Brundige appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brun-dige v. Bassett, No. l:06-cv-112-CMH-LO (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 30, 2006; entered Mar. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Keith Brundige appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brun-dige v. Bassett, No. l:06-cv-112-CMH-LO (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 30, 2006; entered Mar. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brundige v. Bassett, 219 F. App'x 308 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

219 F. App'x 308 (Brundige v. Bassett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related