Brundidge v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Brundidge v. State

161 So. 915, 26 Ala. App. 624

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 1935·No. 4 Div. 109.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The’defendant was indicted on a charge of assault to- murder and on her trial was convicted of assault and battery.

The verdict of the jury had the effect of acquitting the defendant of the charge of as *916 sault to murder, .and hence it becomes unnecessary for us to pass upon any questions relating alone to that charge. We have examined the record relative to the charge of assault and battery, and nowhere do we find error. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

The’defendant was indicted on a charge of assault to- murder and on her trial was convicted of assault and battery.

The verdict of the jury had the effect of acquitting the defendant of the charge of as *916 sault to murder, .and hence it becomes unnecessary for us to pass upon any questions relating alone to that charge. We have examined the record relative to the charge of assault and battery, and nowhere do we find error. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Brundidge v. State, 161 So. 915, 26 Ala. App. 624 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

161 So. 915 (Brundidge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.