Brundidge v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Brundidge v. State

161 So. 915, 26 Ala. App. 624

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 1935

Docket4 Div. 109.

StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 915 (Brundidge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brundidge v. State, 161 So. 915, 26 Ala. App. 624 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The’defendant was indicted on a charge of assault to- murder and on her trial was convicted of assault and battery.

The verdict of the jury had the effect of acquitting the defendant of the charge of as *916 sault to murder, .and hence it becomes unnecessary for us to pass upon any questions relating alone to that charge. We have examined the record relative to the charge of assault and battery, and nowhere do we find error. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

The’defendant was indicted on a charge of assault to- murder and on her trial was convicted of assault and battery.

The verdict of the jury had the effect of acquitting the defendant of the charge of as *916 sault to murder, .and hence it becomes unnecessary for us to pass upon any questions relating alone to that charge. We have examined the record relative to the charge of assault and battery, and nowhere do we find error. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 So. 915, 26 Ala. App. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brundidge-v-state-alactapp-1935.