Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brundage v. State

Brundage v. State

688 So. 2d 1037, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2537, 1997 WL 121170
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 1997
DocketNo. 96-01661
StatusPublished

This text of 688 So. 2d 1037 (Brundage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brundage v. State, 688 So. 2d 1037, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2537, 1997 WL 121170 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the state’s confession of error, we reverse the sentence imposed below and remand to the trial court for re-sentencing.

The Department of Corrections (or the Department of Juvenile Justice) is instructed to add to the pre-sentence investigation its recommendation as to the proper disposition of this case. § 39.059(7), Fla. Stat. (1995). Upon re-sentencing, the trial court will, if it decides to impose adult sanctions, enter a written order as required by section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes See also Crabb v. State, 676 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crabb v. State
676 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 So. 2d 1037, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2537, 1997 WL 121170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brundage-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.