Brundage v. Randolph Twp.
This text of 154 A.2d 581 (Brundage v. Randolph Twp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CHARLES E. BRUNDAGE AND EDNA T. BRUNDAGE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; FRANK THORBURN, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH; AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Milton A. Dauber argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys).
Mr. Harry L. Sears argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Young & Sears, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Freund in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A.2d 581, 30 N.J. 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brundage-v-randolph-twp-nj-1959.