Brumsey v. . Mathias

6 S.E.2d 495, 216 N.C. 743, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 383
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 3, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 6 S.E.2d 495 (Brumsey v. . Mathias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brumsey v. . Mathias, 6 S.E.2d 495, 216 N.C. 743, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 383 (N.C. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The injury to plaintiff occurred in the State of Virginia. The evidence indicates that plaintiff was a guest. Under the law of Virginia a guest cannot recover except for gross negligence.

From a careful reading and re-reading of the record and briefs, we cannot say that the conduct of defendants amounted to gross negligence. Farfour v. Fahad, 214 N. C., 281.

The judgment is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farfour v. . Fahad
199 S.E. 521 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 S.E.2d 495, 216 N.C. 743, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brumsey-v-mathias-nc-1940.