Brummell v. Brummell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brummell v. Brummell

279 A.D.2d 544, 719 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 583

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 544 (Brummell v. Brummell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brummell v. Brummell, 279 A.D.2d 544, 719 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the [545]*545Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated January 6, 2000, which, inter alia, awarded him only 40% of the value of the plaintiffs nursing license, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same judgment as awarded the defendant 40% of the value of her nursing license.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in awarding 40% of the value of the plaintiffs nursing license to the defendant (see, Bugliari v Bugliari, 169 AD2d 697; Maloney v Maloney, 137 AD2d 666).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the [545]*545Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated January 6, 2000, which, inter alia, awarded him only 40% of the value of the plaintiffs nursing license, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same judgment as awarded the defendant 40% of the value of her nursing license.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in awarding 40% of the value of the plaintiffs nursing license to the defendant (see, Bugliari v Bugliari, 169 AD2d 697; Maloney v Maloney, 137 AD2d 666).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 544, 719 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brummell-v-brummell-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack