Brummell v. Brummell

279 A.D.2d 544, 719 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 583

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the [545] Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated January 6, 2000, which, inter alia, awarded him only 40% of the value of the plaintiffs nursing license, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same judgment as awarded the defendant 40% of the value of her nursing license.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in awarding 40% of the value of the plaintiffs nursing license to the defendant (see, Bugliari v Bugliari, 169 AD2d 697; Maloney v Maloney, 137 AD2d 666).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brummell v. Brummell, 279 A.D.2d 544, 719 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

279 A.D.2d 544 (Brummell v. Brummell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maloney v. Maloney
137 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Bugliari v. Bugliari
169 A.D.2d 697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)