Home/New York Court of Appeals/Brumfield v. Tofany

Brumfield v. Tofany

293 N.E.2d 92, 31 N.Y.2d 928, 340 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 892
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 29, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 N.E.2d 92 (Brumfield v. Tofany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brumfield v. Tofany, 293 N.E.2d 92, 31 N.Y.2d 928, 340 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 892 (N.Y. 1972).

Opinions

Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Onondaga County, for a hearing to determine whether or not proof of appellant’s financial security was at all times in effect. (See Matter of Hanmer v. Tofany, 34 A D 2d 383.) In the posture in which the case comes to us, it is unnecessary to decide the constitutionality of subdivisions 1 and 13 of section 318 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. The stay, granted by the court on July 19, 1971, is continued.

Concur: Chief Judge Ftjld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Gibson. Judges Breitel and Jasen dissent and vote to affirm in the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conroy v. Melton
82 Misc. 2d 750 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 N.E.2d 92, 31 N.Y.2d 928, 340 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brumfield-v-tofany-ny-1972.