BRUMFIELD v. SAUL
This text of BRUMFIELD v. SAUL (BRUMFIELD v. SAUL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KIMBERLY BRUMFIELD, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CIVIL ACTION No. 19-4555-RAL ANDREW SAUL : Commissioner : of Social Security, : : Defendant. : O R D E R AND NOW this 21st day of August, 2020, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED and the final order of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); and 3. The Clerk of Courts shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics. BY THE COURT:
_s/Richard A. Lloret______________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BRUMFIELD v. SAUL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brumfield-v-saul-paed-2020.