BRUMFIELD v. SAUL
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KIMBERLY BRUMFIELD, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CIVIL ACTION No. 19-4555-RAL ANDREW SAUL : Commissioner : of Social Security, : : Defendant. : O R D E R AND NOW this 21st day of August, 2020, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED and the final order of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); and 3. The Clerk of Courts shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics. BY THE COURT:
_s/Richard A. Lloret______________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BRUMFIELD v. SAUL (BRUMFIELD v. SAUL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.