BRUMFIELD v. SAUL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided August 21, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-04555·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KIMBERLY BRUMFIELD, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CIVIL ACTION No. 19-4555-RAL ANDREW SAUL : Commissioner : of Social Security, : : Defendant. : O R D E R AND NOW this 21st day of August, 2020, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED and the final order of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); and 3. The Clerk of Courts shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics. BY THE COURT:

_s/Richard A. Lloret______________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRUMFIELD v. SAUL, (E.D. Pa. 2020).

BRUMFIELD v. SAUL (BRUMFIELD v. SAUL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)