Brumfield v. Home Owners Loan Corporation

29 S.E.2d 312, 70 Ga. App. 686, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 79
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 22, 1944
Docket30375.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 S.E.2d 312 (Brumfield v. Home Owners Loan Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brumfield v. Home Owners Loan Corporation, 29 S.E.2d 312, 70 Ga. App. 686, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 79 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Felton, J.

1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial not having the approval of the trial judge, present no question for determination by this court.

2. It was not error to direct a verdict for possession of the premises in dispute in favor of the plaintiff in the dispossessory warrant, the verdict so directed being demanded by the evidence.

3. In the absence of any showing to the contrary, it will be presumed that the amount of monthly rent found by the jury to be due for the premises, was the double rent contemplated by the law, and that this issue was presented to them under a proper charge of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, P. J., and Parker, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bedgood v. Rogers
58 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E.2d 312, 70 Ga. App. 686, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brumfield-v-home-owners-loan-corporation-gactapp-1944.