Brumbaugh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Brumbaugh v. State

148 P. 1145, 11 Okla. Crim. 727

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 1, 1900·No. No. A-2272.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Emma Brumbaugh, was convicted at the January, 1914, term of the county court of Comanche county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and adjudged to pay a fine of three hundred thirty dollars and to be imprisoned in the county jail for. a period of one hundred days. '

The Attorney General'has conceded error in this ease and advised the court, that in his opinion the judgment of conviction should be reversed.

*728 An examination of the record sustains the confession in error. The judgment of conviction is, therefore, reversed and the cause re.manded, with directions to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Emma Brumbaugh, was convicted at the January, 1914, term of the county court of Comanche county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and adjudged to pay a fine of three hundred thirty dollars and to be imprisoned in the county jail for. a period of one hundred days. '

The Attorney General'has conceded error in this ease and advised the court, that in his opinion the judgment of conviction should be reversed.

*728 An examination of the record sustains the confession in error. The judgment of conviction is, therefore, reversed and the cause re.manded, with directions to grant a new trial.

Brumbaugh v. State, 148 P. 1145, 11 Okla. Crim. 727 (Okla. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

148 P. 1145 (Brumbaugh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.