Brumbaugh v. Raystown Water Power Co.
This text of 103 A. 656 (Brumbaugh v. Raystown Water Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole .complaint of the appellant is of the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial for alleged improper remarks of counsel for plaintiff in addressing the [366]*366jury. No objection was made to them by counsel for defendant at the time they were uttered, and the learned trial judge instructed the jury to disregard them. It was too late for the defendant to complain of them for the first time after a verdict unsatisfactory to it had been rendered, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 A. 656, 260 Pa. 365, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brumbaugh-v-raystown-water-power-co-pa-1918.