Brum v. West Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Brum v. West Virginia

180 F. App'x 465

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2006·No. No. 05-2143·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dale E. Brum and Timothy A. Fittro appeal the district court’s order dismissing Brum’s civil action challenging West Virginia’s domestic relations law and policy regarding child custody and child support. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brum v. West Virginia, No. CA-04-1014-6 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dale E. Brum and Timothy A. Fittro appeal the district court’s order dismissing Brum’s civil action challenging West Virginia’s domestic relations law and policy regarding child custody and child support. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brum v. West Virginia, No. CA-04-1014-6 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brum v. West Virginia, 180 F. App'x 465 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

180 F. App'x 465 (Brum v. West Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.