Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company
376 U.S. 905, 84 S. Ct. 666
This text of 376 U.S. 905 (Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company, 376 U.S. 905, 84 S. Ct. 666 (1964).
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington is granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
“1. Whether it is a misuse to include in a license agreement a provision which perpetuates the monopoly of a licensed patent by a requirement that royalties be paid for the use of the invention after the patent has expired and the invention had been dedicated to the public.
“2. Whether it is a misuse or an antitrust violation to include in a license agreement a provision which extends the monopoly of a patent to unpatented subject matter by a provision which requires the payment of post-expiration royalties.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
376 U.S. 905, 84 S. Ct. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brulotte-et-al-v-thys-company-scotus-1964.