Bruin v. Sasser
This text of 25 La. Ann. 224 (Bruin v. Sasser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case comes up on the following statement of facts:
“The note herein sued upon was given to the plaintiff, Joseph Bruin, by the defendant, Sasser, being the balance due on a slave for life, «uaranteed to be such by the said plaintiff, in the act of sale passed before a notary public in the city of New Orleans, Louisiana, at the time the note is dated.
[225]*225■ “The slave was a mechanic, and. defendant paid the plaintiff $1600 ■cash, and gave besides the note herein sued upon, at the time of the purchase.
“ The slave so purchased, remained in possession of the defendant until he was emancipated or set free by the Government, in 1864 or 1865.”
Under the settled jurisprudence of this court, there is no authority for the judgment herein rendered against the defendant.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be avoided, annulled and reversed, and that there be judgment in favor of the defendant, the costs in both courts to be paid by plaintiff and appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 La. Ann. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruin-v-sasser-la-1873.