Bruid v. McVickar

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bruid v. McVickar

31 Misc. 793

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 15, 1900·Published

Opinion

Per Gw'iam.

The record shows that the plaintiff knew that the defendants were acting as agents for the landlord. Her cause of action with respect to the money paid by her, if she has any, is, therefore, against the landlord and not against the defendants. Cooper v. Tim, 16 Misc. Rep. 372.

• It follows that the judgment must be reversed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Gw'iam.

The record shows that the plaintiff knew that the defendants were acting as agents for the landlord. Her cause of action with respect to the money paid by her, if she has any, is, therefore, against the landlord and not against the defendants. Cooper v. Tim, 16 Misc. Rep. 372.

• It follows that the judgment must be reversed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Bruid v. McVickar, 31 Misc. 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

31 Misc. 793 (Bruid v. McVickar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related