Bruid v. McVickar

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bruid v. McVickar

65 N.Y.S. 1128

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.Y.S. 1128 (Bruid v. McVickar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruid v. McVickar, 65 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record shows that the plaintiff knew that the,defendants were acting as agents for the landlord. Her cause of action with respect to the money paid by her, if she has any, is therefore against the landlord, , and not against the defendants. Cooper v. Tim, 16 Misc. Rep. 372, 38 N. Y. Supp. 67. It follows that the judgment must be reversed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The record shows that the plaintiff knew that the,defendants were acting as agents for the landlord. Her cause of action with respect to the money paid by her, if she has any, is therefore against the landlord, , and not against the defendants. Cooper v. Tim, 16 Misc. Rep. 372, 38 N. Y. Supp. 67. It follows that the judgment must be reversed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruid-v-mcvickar-nyappterm-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack