Bruhns v. Antonelli

255 A.D.2d 478, 680 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12650
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 23, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 255 A.D.2d 478 (Bruhns v. Antonelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruhns v. Antonelli, 255 A.D.2d 478, 680 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated November 24, 1997, which granted the motion of the defendant R. J. Smith Realtors, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The injured plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, was injured on the subject premises while showing the premises to prospective buyers. The injured plaintiff had gained access to the premises from the defendant R. J. Smith Realtors, Inc. (hereinafter the respondent), who was the listing real estate agent for the property. The respondent moved for summary judgment arguing, inter alia, that it owed no duty to the injured plaintiff.

As a general rule, liability for a dangerous condition on property is predicated upon ownership, occupancy, control, or special use (see, Millman v Citibank, 216 AD2d 278). Upon our review of the record, we find no evidence that would raise an issue of fact as to any of these elements. The respondent owed no duty of care to the injured plaintiff, and may not be held liable for the existence of an allegedly dangerous condition on the property. Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the respondent. Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riddell v. Brown
32 A.D.3d 1212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Schwalb v. Kulaski
29 A.D.3d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pirie v. Krasinski
18 A.D.3d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
O'Keefe v. Valente Industries Corp.
266 A.D.2d 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D.2d 478, 680 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruhns-v-antonelli-nyappdiv-1998.