Brugno v. Meiselman
225 A.D. 686
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1928·Published
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The order was improperly made for the reason that its effect is to bring in a new party — a defendant who has not been brought into court in this action. (Gray v. Vought & Co., 216 App. Div. 230.) Rich, Young, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur. Lazansky, P. J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brugno v. Meiselman, 225 A.D. 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
225 A.D. 686 (Brugno v. Meiselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gray v. H. H. Vought & Co.
216 A.D. 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)