Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

86 N.Y.2d 880

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 1, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 86 N.Y.2d 880 (Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 86 N.Y.2d 880 (N.Y. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeál from that part of [881]*881the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their bill of particulars, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeál from that part of [881]*881the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their bill of particulars, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.Y.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brugnano-v-merrill-lynch-co-ny-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack