Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
86 N.Y.2d 880
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeál from that part of [881] the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their bill of particulars, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 86 N.Y.2d 880 (N.Y. 1995).
86 N.Y.2d 880 (Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henriquez v. New 520 Gsh LLC
88 A.D.3d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Lopez v. Fordham University
69 A.D.3d 532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Jackson v. Board of Education
30 A.D.3d 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)