Brugh v. Savings & Profit Sharing Pension Fund of United Insurance Co. of America

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brugh v. Savings & Profit Sharing Pension Fund of United Insurance Co. of America

211 So. 2d 613, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5488

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1968

DocketNo. J-430

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 So. 2d 613 (Brugh v. Savings & Profit Sharing Pension Fund of United Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brugh v. Savings & Profit Sharing Pension Fund of United Insurance Co. of America, 211 So. 2d 613, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5488 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented on this appeal concerns the sufficiency of service of process upon Appellant Lora L. Brugh. A deputy sheriff of Leon County, Florida, attempted to institute service of process upon Appellant by serving her husband, Appellant Ronald C. Brugh. Evidence was adduced by Appellant Ronald C. Brugh going to the question as to whether the deputy sheriff strictly followed the provisions of Section 47.13, Florida Statutes, 1965, F.S.A. The return on the summons reflects that the deputy sheriff properly complied with the dictates of the statute. We conclude that the Appellant has not presented such clear and convincing evidence that will suffice to impeach the return.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented on this appeal concerns the sufficiency of service of process upon Appellant Lora L. Brugh. A deputy sheriff of Leon County, Florida, attempted to institute service of process upon Appellant by serving her husband, Appellant Ronald C. Brugh. Evidence was adduced by Appellant Ronald C. Brugh going to the question as to whether the deputy sheriff strictly followed the provisions of Section 47.13, Florida Statutes, 1965, F.S.A. The return on the summons reflects that the deputy sheriff properly complied with the dictates of the statute. We conclude that the Appellant has not presented such clear and convincing evidence that will suffice to impeach the return.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 So. 2d 613, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brugh-v-savings-profit-sharing-pension-fund-of-united-insurance-co-of-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack