Brugh v. Savings & Profit Sharing Pension Fund of United Insurance Co. of America

211 So. 2d 613, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5488
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1968·No. No. J-430·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented on this appeal concerns the sufficiency of service of process upon Appellant Lora L. Brugh. A deputy sheriff of Leon County, Florida, attempted to institute service of process upon Appellant by serving her husband, Appellant Ronald C. Brugh. Evidence was adduced by Appellant Ronald C. Brugh going to the question as to whether the deputy sheriff strictly followed the provisions of Section 47.13, Florida Statutes, 1965, F.S.A. The return on the summons reflects that the deputy sheriff properly complied with the dictates of the statute. We conclude that the Appellant has not presented such clear and convincing evidence that will suffice to impeach the return.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brugh v. Savings & Profit Sharing Pension Fund of United Insurance Co. of America, 211 So. 2d 613, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5488 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

211 So. 2d 613 (Brugh v. Savings & Profit Sharing Pension Fund of United Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Telf Corp. v. Gomez
671 So. 2d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)