Bruggisser v. Bruggisser

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bruggisser v. Bruggisser

133 So. 2d 654

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 19, 1961

DocketNo. 61-175

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 133 So. 2d 654 (Bruggisser v. Bruggisser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruggisser v. Bruggisser, 133 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former wife, who was the plaintiff in a divorce action, appeals from an order modifying final decree of divorce by reducing the amount of the alimony and altering the visitation rights accorded to the appellee. After examining the record and reading the testimony presented, we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the order of the chancellor. Although this court might have decided the questions presented differently, an appellate court should not substitute its judgment for that of the chancellor when the record contains substantial evidence in support of his conclusion. E. g., Brenner v. Smullian, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 44, 49; Board of County Com’rs v. F. A. Sebring Realty Co., Fla. 1953, 63 So.2d 256, 258.

The order appealed therefore must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The former wife, who was the plaintiff in a divorce action, appeals from an order modifying final decree of divorce by reducing the amount of the alimony and altering the visitation rights accorded to the appellee. After examining the record and reading the testimony presented, we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the order of the chancellor. Although this court might have decided the questions presented differently, an appellate court should not substitute its judgment for that of the chancellor when the record contains substantial evidence in support of his conclusion. E. g., Brenner v. Smullian, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 44, 49; Board of County Com’rs v. F. A. Sebring Realty Co., Fla. 1953, 63 So.2d 256, 258.

The order appealed therefore must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 So. 2d 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruggisser-v-bruggisser-fladistctapp-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack