Bruggisser v. Bruggisser

133 So. 2d 654
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1961·No. No. 61-175·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former wife, who was the plaintiff in a divorce action, appeals from an order modifying final decree of divorce by reducing the amount of the alimony and altering the visitation rights accorded to the appellee. After examining the record and reading the testimony presented, we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the order of the chancellor. Although this court might have decided the questions presented differently, an appellate court should not substitute its judgment for that of the chancellor when the record contains substantial evidence in support of his conclusion. E. g., Brenner v. Smullian, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 44, 49; Board of County Com’rs v. F. A. Sebring Realty Co., Fla. 1953, 63 So.2d 256, 258.

The order appealed therefore must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruggisser v. Bruggisser, 133 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

133 So. 2d 654 (Bruggisser v. Bruggisser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barton v. Barton
338 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Tagliarini v. Tagliarini
213 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Seraydar v. Seraydar
178 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Wrains v. Rose
175 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Bennett v. Bennett
146 So. 2d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)