Bruen v. Goodman

172 Misc. 775, 16 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2516
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 1, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 172 Misc. 775 (Bruen v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruen v. Goodman, 172 Misc. 775, 16 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The enactment of section 775 of the Civil Practice Act was intended to aid judgment creditors in the collection of judgments.

Under the circumstances presented the judgment creditors in their examination of the judgment debtor should not have beéri limited to the period subsequent to the first examination under the City Court judgment.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 Misc. 775, 16 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruen-v-goodman-nyappterm-1939.