Bruen v. Bragaw

4 N.J. Eq. 261
New Jersey Court of Chancery·Decided October 15, 1842·Published

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The demurrer presents for decision in this case, the sole question, whether lands acquired after the execution of a will, will pass by a devise in the residuary clause of that will, I take it to be well settled, that they will not. The devise is in the nature of a conveyance, and it can affect no lands purchased after the will is executed. This is clearly the rule of the English law, and in most of the states, except where a change is made by statute: 3 John. Chan. 310; 4 Kent's Com. 510; 9 John. 312; 6 Mass. 149; 11 Modern, 121; 1 Salk. 237; Saxton, 229.

The demurrer must, therefore, be overruled with costs.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruen v. Bragaw, 4 N.J. Eq. 261 (N.J. Ct. App. 1842).

4 N.J. Eq. 261 (Bruen v. Bragaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson ex dem. Rogers v. Potter
9 Johns. 312 (New York Supreme Court, 1812)
Hays v. Jackson
6 Mass. 149 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1809)