Bruen v. Bragaw
This text of 3 N.J. Eq. 261 (Bruen v. Bragaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The demurrer presents for decision in this case, the sole question, whether lands acquired after the execution of a will, will pass by a devise in the residuary clause of that will. I take it to be well settled, that they will not. The devise is in the nature of a conveyance,and it can effect no lands purchased after the will is executed. This is clearly the rule of the English law, and in most of the states, except where a change is made by statute: 3 John. Chan. 310; 4 Kent’s Com. 510; 9 John. 312; 6 Mass. 149; 11 Modern, 121; 1 Salk. 237; Saxton, 229.
The demurrer must, therefore, be overruled with costs.
Order accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.J. Eq. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruen-v-bragaw-njch-1842.