Bruen v. Bragaw

3 N.J. Eq. 261
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedOctober 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J. Eq. 261 (Bruen v. Bragaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruen v. Bragaw, 3 N.J. Eq. 261 (N.J. Ct. App. 1842).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The demurrer presents for decision in this case, the sole question, whether lands acquired after the execution of a will, will pass by a devise in the residuary clause of that will. I take it to be well settled, that they will not. The devise is in the nature of a conveyance,and it can effect no lands purchased after the will is executed. This is clearly the rule of the English law, and in most of the states, except where a change is made by statute: 3 John. Chan. 310; 4 Kent’s Com. 510; 9 John. 312; 6 Mass. 149; 11 Modern, 121; 1 Salk. 237; Saxton, 229.

The demurrer must, therefore, be overruled with costs.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson ex dem. Rogers v. Potter
9 Johns. 312 (New York Supreme Court, 1812)
Hays v. Jackson
6 Mass. 149 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1809)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.J. Eq. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruen-v-bragaw-njch-1842.