Brue v. Murray

241 A.D. 830

This text of 241 A.D. 830 (Brue v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brue v. Murray, 241 A.D. 830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order denying motion for a peremptory or an alternative mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs, in the exercise of discretion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brue-v-murray-nyappdiv-1934.