Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission

235 N.E.2d 238, 14 Ohio St. 2d 24, 43 Ohio Op. 2d 13, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 411

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 27, 1968

DocketNo. 41138

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 N.E.2d 238 (Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission, 235 N.E.2d 238, 14 Ohio St. 2d 24, 43 Ohio Op. 2d 13, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 411 (Ohio 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s contention, that Rule 1.04 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the Public Utilities Commission is invalid on the ground that it violates Section 16 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is without merit.

Upon consideration of the record, this court holds that the order of the commission denying applicant’s application [25]*25is neither unreasonable nor unlawful. Section 4903.13, Revised Code; H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145, 19 N. E. 2d 956; Jones v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 237, 47 N. E. 2d 780.

Therefore, the order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., ZxmmebmaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI