Bruckert-Holland v. Rand

234 A.D.2d 95, 650 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12396

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered on July 11, 1995, which denied defendant’s motion for a change of venue to Essex County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied, defendant having failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR 511 (b) necessary to preserve his right to a change of venue under CPLR 510 (1). Further, defendant offered no other reason for changing venue except his own inconvenience, which showing was patently insufficient (see, Rosenthal v Bologna, 211 AD2d 436, 437; Cardona v Aggressive Heating, 180 AD2d 572, 573; Coles v LaGuardia Med. Group, 161 AD2d 166). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruckert-Holland v. Rand, 234 A.D.2d 95, 650 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 95 (Bruckert-Holland v. Rand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coles v. LaGuardia Medical Group, P. C.
161 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Cardon v. Aggressive Heating Inc.
180 A.D.2d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Rosenthal v. Bologna
211 A.D.2d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)