Brucia v. Planning Board

556 N.E.2d 1114, 75 N.Y.2d 991, 557 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1022
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 3, 1990
StatusPublished

This text of 556 N.E.2d 1114 (Brucia v. Planning Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brucia v. Planning Board, 556 N.E.2d 1114, 75 N.Y.2d 991, 557 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1022 (N.Y. 1990).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Cross motion by respondents Rotolo for an order tolling the 180-day period of conditional final approval denied.

Motion by respondent Sherri Construction Corporation for [992]*992an order tolling the 180-day period of conditional final approval denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 N.E.2d 1114, 75 N.Y.2d 991, 557 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brucia-v-planning-board-ny-1990.