Bruce Wayne Harkey v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 29, 2014
Docket03-14-00734-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Bruce Wayne Harkey v. State (Bruce Wayne Harkey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruce Wayne Harkey v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00734-CR 3608753 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/29/2014 5:32:54 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-14-00734-CR

FILED IN In The Third Court of Appeals 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Austin, Texas 12/29/2014 5:32:54 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk

BRUCE WAYNE HARKEY Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Cause no. CRS 7 31 On Appeal from the 33rd Judicial District Court of Llano County, Llano, Texas

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellant, Bruce Wayne Harkey, pursuant to Rule 10.5 of the Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure, by and through his attorney of record, requests an extension of time to file appellant's brief, and in support thereof would show the

court the following:

1_The reporter's record was filed on December 1, 2014. The clerk's record was

filed on November 17, 2014.

2_Under the court's briefing schedule, the appellant's brief is currently due on

January 5, 2015.

3_The Court Reporter's Record exceeds ten (10) volumes oftestimony and the

trial before the jury was approximately one and one-half week in duration.

More than 100 exhibits were admitted.

4_The undersigned attorney has an extensive trial practice, both civil and

criminal. Further, the undersigned counsel has numerous and regular court

appearances consisting of motions to revoke and suppression hearings.

Likewise, the undersigned is preparing for several jury trials which are subject

to being tried within the following sixty (60) days.

5_ In order to prepare a brief that will be of assistance to the Court, the

undersigned seeks a 60-day extension of time to file its appellant's brief, so

that the briefwill be due on March 6, 2015.

6_This is the first request for an extension of time to file Appellant's brief. This

extension is not sought solely for delay, but is necessary so that justice can be

done.

For these reasons, Appellant respectfully requests that the Court grant this

motion to extend the time for filing Appellant's brief and allow that brief to be filed on or before March 6, 2015. Appellant also requests any other relief to

which it may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

~ 111 E. Jackson Street PO Box 398 Burnet, Texas 78611 (512)756-5117 (512) 756-0164 Fax State Bar No. 05537100 Email: rdd@austin. twcbc.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for Extension of

Time to File Appellant's Brief has been hand delivered, or sent by U.S. mail, certified

return receipt requested, or transmitted by telephonic transfer to the counsel for the State,

Gary W. Bunyard, of the Office of the District Attorney of Llano County, P.O. Box 725,

Llano, Texas 78643; on this th~ 1~day of J) e_ c..~~, 2014.

RICHARD D. DAVIS

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned by his signature below certifies that the District Attorney's Office of the

33RD Judicial District has been contacted and that this motion i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bruce Wayne Harkey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-wayne-harkey-v-state-texapp-2014.