Bruce v. Woll Bros.

New York Court of Appeals

Bruce v. Woll Bros.

170 N.E.2d 402, 8 N.Y.2d 1052

DecidedOctober 13, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 170 N.E.2d 402 (Bruce v. Woll Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruce v. Woll Bros., 170 N.E.2d 402, 8 N.Y.2d 1052 (N.Y. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The landlord was privileged under the judgment in the form appealed from to make whatever decorations, repairs, alterations or improvements or additions as were permitted by paragraph 13 in the lease, provided the store frontage or display window as installed by the tenant pursuant to paragraph 39 of the lease was not affected or impaired. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The landlord was privileged under the judgment in the form appealed from to make whatever decorations, repairs, alterations or improvements or additions as were permitted by paragraph 13 in the lease, provided the store frontage or display window as installed by the tenant pursuant to paragraph 39 of the lease was not affected or impaired. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 N.E.2d 402, 8 N.Y.2d 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-v-woll-bros-ny-1960.