Bruce v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Bruce v. United States

113 F. 1017, 51 C.C.A. 684, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 30, 1901

DocketNo. 1,538

StatusPublished

This text of 113 F. 1017 (Bruce v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruce v. United States, 113 F. 1017, 51 C.C.A. 684, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166 (8th Cir. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

ADAMS, District Judge.

Bruce, plaintiff in error, was an employs of John C. Teller, engaged in the work of cutting timber for him under the circumstances disclosed in the case of Teller v. U. S. (decided at this term of court) 113 Fed. 273. This case was argued with that, and submitted on the same briefs. No facts or principles are invoked in behalf of Bruce other or different from those urged in favor of Teller. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court sentencing him to pay a fine of $500 Is, on the authority of Teller v. U. S., supra, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ADAMS, District Judge.

Bruce, plaintiff in error, was an employs of John C. Teller, engaged in the work of cutting timber for him under the circumstances disclosed in the case of Teller v. U. S. (decided at this term of court) 113 Fed. 273. This case was argued with that, and submitted on the same briefs. No facts or principles are invoked in behalf of Bruce other or different from those urged in favor of Teller. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court sentencing him to pay a fine of $500 Is, on the authority of Teller v. U. S., supra, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 F. 1017, 51 C.C.A. 684, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-v-united-states-ca8-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack