Bruce v. State
This text of 113 S.W.2d 538 (Bruce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Conviction for the theft of an automobile ; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without bills of exception or state- ’ ment of facts. There appears in the transcript an affidavit filed in the trial court setting up the inability of appellant to pay for a statement of facts or to give security therefor. There is nothing to show that said affidavit was called to the attention of the trial judge. It follows that a reversal of the judgment on the ground that appellant has been deprived of a statement of facts would not be warranted. Fuller v. State, 264 S. W. Rep., 953; Beddingfield v. State, 93 S. W. (2d) 738; Kelley v. State, 91 S. W. (2d) 343; Moore v. State, 104 S. W. (2d) 862.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 S.W.2d 538, 133 Tex. Crim. 593, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.