Bruce v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bruce v. State

174 S.E. 199, 48 Ga. App. 854, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 230

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 29, 1934

Docket23903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 S.E. 199 (Bruce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruce v. State, 174 S.E. 199, 48 Ga. App. 854, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 230 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Guerry, J.

1. The evidence demanded the finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of having in his possession, custody, and control prohibited beverages, to wit: “beer, malt beer, and lager beer, beverages containing more than one half of one per cent, alcohol by volume at sixty degrees Fahrenheit,” etc.

2. The court did not err in failing to give to the jury a written charge requested by the defendant, to the effect that if the defendant possessed beer as charged, but was ignorant of its alcoholic content, he could not be found guilty. The evidence disclosed that the defendant' was seen behind the counter in a store selling beer, and that he had refused to stop such sales after notice. See Ware v. State, 6 Ga. App. 578 (65 S. E. 333).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI