Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bruce v. State

Bruce v. State

622 So. 2d 638, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8897, 1993 WL 324037
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bruce v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 616 So. 2d 504 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 1993·No. No. 92-01360·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that the court erred when it revoked his probation. Although our review leads us to conclude that the record contains sufficient evidence to find that appellant violated his probation, we remand for the trial court to properly specify which conditions were violated in a written order of revocation.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruce v. State, 622 So. 2d 638, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8897, 1993 WL 324037 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 638 (Bruce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.