Bruce v. Sidelinger

19 A. 824, 82 Me. 318, 1890 Me. LEXIS 37
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided February 11, 1890·Published

Opinion

Peters, C. J.

The.plaintiff sued for his services in peeling bark, cutting logs, and hauling the bark and logs to a place of delivery. He was to be paid by the cord for peeling and hauling the- bark, and by the thousands of feet for the work on the lum[319]*319ber. He was allowed to testify to a measurement of the bark and a survey of the lumber made by himself. The defendant contends that the quantities should have been proved by a sworn surveyor, or by the certificate of a sworn surveyor. That cannot be. The statute which requires sworn officers to make surveys and measurements, distinctly and in terms relates to sales only. Work upon lumber is a very different thing from a sale of lumber. The construction which the defendant invokes would be impracticable in its operation.

Exceptions overruled.

Walton, Virgin, Emery, Foster and Haskell, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruce v. Sidelinger, 19 A. 824, 82 Me. 318, 1890 Me. LEXIS 37 (Me. 1890).

19 A. 824 (Bruce v. Sidelinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.