Bruce v. Pearson

3 Johns. 534
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 3 Johns. 534 (Bruce v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruce v. Pearson, 3 Johns. 534 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order sent by the defendant to the plaintiffs, was for 6 hogsheads of rum, and other articles, at a credit of six months ; and the plaintiffs sent only 3 hogsheads, and omitted part of the other articles, charging those sent, at a credit of three mdnths. This cannot amount to a contract. There is no agreement, no aggregatia menlium between the parties, as to the thing, or subject matter of the contract. The defendant wished to have [536]*536the whole of the goods ; a part of them might be of no use ; and until he assented to receive a part instead of the whole, he cannot be said to have contracted to pay for a part; and there can be no implied assumpsit to pay, as the goods sent, never came to his hands.

Judgment of nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sun Publishing Co. v. Minnesota Type Foundry Co.
29 P. 6 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1892)
Rugg v. Davis
15 Ill. App. 647 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Widner v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
16 N.W. 653 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1883)
Corrigan v. Sheffield
17 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 227 (New York Supreme Court, 1877)
Smith v. Lewis
40 Ind. 98 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)
Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. Mather
30 Iowa 283 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1870)
Barton v. Kane
17 Wis. 37 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1863)
Mills v. Gilpin
2 Del. 32 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-v-pearson-nysupct-1808.