Bruce v. Pearson
This text of 3 Johns. 534 (Bruce v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order sent by the defendant to the plaintiffs, was for 6 hogsheads of rum, and other articles, at a credit of six months ; and the plaintiffs sent only 3 hogsheads, and omitted part of the other articles, charging those sent, at a credit of three mdnths. This cannot amount to a contract. There is no agreement, no aggregatia menlium between the parties, as to the thing, or subject matter of the contract. The defendant wished to have [536]*536the whole of the goods ; a part of them might be of no use ; and until he assented to receive a part instead of the whole, he cannot be said to have contracted to pay for a part; and there can be no implied assumpsit to pay, as the goods sent, never came to his hands.
Judgment of nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Johns. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-v-pearson-nysupct-1808.