Bruce v. Eve

186 S.E. 909, 182 Ga. 781, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 564
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 3, 1936
DocketNo. 11231
StatusPublished

This text of 186 S.E. 909 (Bruce v. Eve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruce v. Eve, 186 S.E. 909, 182 Ga. 781, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 564 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

This court having, issued a rule nisi which was served upon counsel for both parties in the case, and the counsel for the plaintiff in error herein having admitted that in view of a decision [782]*782in another case in the Court of Appeals (Bruce v. Fogarty, 53 Ga. App. 443), the question presented in the writ of error of plaintiff is now moot, it is ordered that the writ of error be

No. 11231. July 3, 1936. Abram Levy, for plaintiff in error. D. G. Fogarty, Paul T. Chance, and Slarlcey S. Flythe, contra.

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bruce v. Fogarty
186 S.E. 463 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 S.E. 909, 182 Ga. 781, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-v-eve-ga-1936.