Bruce v. Eve

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bruce v. Eve

186 S.E. 909, 182 Ga. 781, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 564

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 3, 1936·No. No. 11231·Published

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

This court having, issued a rule nisi which was served upon counsel for both parties in the case, and the counsel for the plaintiff in error herein having admitted that in view of a decision [782]*782in another case in the Court of Appeals (Bruce v. Fogarty, 53 Ga. App. 443), the question presented in the writ of error of plaintiff is now moot, it is ordered that the writ of error be

No. 11231. July 3, 1936. Abram Levy, for plaintiff in error. D. G. Fogarty, Paul T. Chance, and Slarlcey S. Flythe, contra.

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

This court having, issued a rule nisi which was served upon counsel for both parties in the case, and the counsel for the plaintiff in error herein having admitted that in view of a decision [782]*782in another case in the Court of Appeals (Bruce v. Fogarty, 53 Ga. App. 443), the question presented in the writ of error of plaintiff is now moot, it is ordered that the writ of error be

No. 11231. July 3, 1936. Abram Levy, for plaintiff in error. D. G. Fogarty, Paul T. Chance, and Slarlcey S. Flythe, contra.

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Bruce v. Eve, 186 S.E. 909, 182 Ga. 781, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 564 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

186 S.E. 909 (Bruce v. Eve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related