Bruce v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
This text of 75 F. App'x 126 (Bruce v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paul S. Bruce seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order denying his motion to reconsider its order affirming the administrative law judge’s finding that he had a two percent partial permanent disability of the right foot pursuant to § 8(c)(4) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901-950 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is rational, based upon substantial evidence, and in accordance with law. Thus, the Board’s decision is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Bruce v. Director, OWCP, No. 01-756 (B.R.B. Sept. 23, 2002 & May 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 F. App'x 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-v-director-office-of-workers-compensation-programs-ca4-2003.