Bruce v. City of Sunset Hills

254 S.W.3d 66, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 102, 2008 WL 170380
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2008·No. ED 89500·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cheri Bruce and Robert Bruce (collectively Plaintiffs) appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Officer John Spicer (Officer Spicer), Officer Richard Westrich (Officer Westrich), and the City of Sunset Hills (the City) (collectively Defendants) on Plaintiffs’ petition for negligence and loss of consortium. On appeal, Plaintiffs argue the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants because (1) Defendants’ actions constituted the proximate cause of Cheri Bruce’s injuries; (2) Officers Spicer and Westrich were not protected by the public duty doctrine; (3) Officers Spicer and Westrich were not protected by official immunity; and (4) the City waived sovereign immunity through the negligent actions of Officers Spicer and Westrich in the operation of their patrol vehicles. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruce v. City of Sunset Hills, 254 S.W.3d 66, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 102, 2008 WL 170380 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

254 S.W.3d 66 (Bruce v. City of Sunset Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Smith
254 S.W.3d 66 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)