BRUCE T. PROLOW v. HUGH QUINN
This text of BRUCE T. PROLOW v. HUGH QUINN (BRUCE T. PROLOW v. HUGH QUINN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
BRUCE T. PROLOW, Appellant,
v.
HUGH QUINN and RED CARPET/HOBE SOUND, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 4D22-1269
[January 26, 2023]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Gerald Joseph Curley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2021-CA- 006331-XXXX-MB.
Brian S. Behar of Behar, Gutt & Glazer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Steven J. Rothman of Jones Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees Hugh Quinn and Red Carpet/Hobe Sound, Inc.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BRUCE T. PROLOW v. HUGH QUINN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-t-prolow-v-hugh-quinn-fladistctapp-2023.